• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   FSM Vakıf
  • Fakülteler / Faculties
  • Eğitim Fakültesi / Faculty of Education
  • Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü
  • View Item
  •   FSM Vakıf
  • Fakülteler / Faculties
  • Eğitim Fakültesi / Faculty of Education
  • Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparison of Classical Test Theory vs. Multi-Facet Rasch Theory

Thumbnail

View/Open

Ana Makale (460.1Kb)

Access

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Date

2022

Author

Polat, Murat
Turhan, Nihan S.
Toraman, Çetin

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

POLAT, Murat, Nihan S. TURHAN & Çetin TORAMAN. "Comparison of Classical Test Theory vs. Multi-Facet Rasch Theory". Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12.2 (2022): 213-225.

Abstract

Testing English writing skills could be multi-dimensional; thus, the study aimed to compare students’ writing scores calculated according to Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Multi-Facet Rasch Model (MFRM). The research was carried out in 2019 with 100 university students studying at a foreign language preparatory class and four experienced instructors who participated in the study as raters. Data of the study were collected by using a writing rubric consisting of four components (content, organization, grammar and vocabulary). Participants’ writing scores were analysed thoroughly both by CTT and MFRM. At the first step, the participants’ writing scores were calculated by taking the means of the writing points given by the graders in the CTT model. Then, the MFRM was applied to the data through a three-facet design considering the rater, student and rubric components as MFRM facets respectively. Finally, ability estimates obtained and reported in the logit scale via Rasch Analysis were converted into the analytic rubric’s component scores used throughout the scoring procedure. Finally, two sets of writing scores were calculated and compared according to both measurement models. Considering the findings, it was summoned that there was a positive and high correlation between the ability estimates found according to the CTT and the MFRM. However, the mean score difference calculated according to both theories was still significant. Moreover, the analyses showed that criterion validity of the writing scores obtained via the MFRM was higher than the scores obtained via the CTT.

Source

Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction

Volume

12

Issue

2

URI

https://www.pegegog.net/index.php/pegegog/article/view/1730
https://hdl.handle.net/11352/4087

Collections

  • Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü [75]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar / Scopus Indexed Publications [404]
  • WOS İndeksli Yayınlar / WOS Indexed Publications [379]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Policy | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@FSM

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Policy || Guide || Library || FSM Vakıf University || OAI-PMH ||

FSM Vakıf University, İstanbul, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
FSM Vakıf University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@FSM:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.