Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDemir, İbrahim
dc.contributor.authorKiraz, Berna
dc.contributor.authorErgin, Fatma Corut
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-30T09:26:29Z
dc.date.available2021-07-30T09:26:29Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationDEMİR, İbrahim, Berna KİRAZ & Fatma Corut ERGİN. "Experimental Evaluation of Meta-Heuristics for Multi-Objective Capacitated Multiple Allocation Hub Location Problem". Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 29.5 (2022).en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098621001440
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11352/3791
dc.description.abstractMulti-objective capacitated multiple allocation hub location problem (MOCMAHLP) is a variation of classic hub location problem, which deals with network design, considering both the number and the location of the hubs and the connections between hubs and spokes, as well as routing of flow on the network. In this study, we offer two meta-heuristic approaches based on the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) and archived multi-objective simulated annealing method (AMOSA) to solve MOCMAHLP. We attuned AMOSA based approach to obtain feasible solutions for the problem and developed five different neighborhood operators in this approach. Moreover, for NSGA-II based approach, we developed two novel problem-specific mutation operators. To statistically analyze the behavior of both algorithms, we conducted experiments on two well-known data sets, namely Turkish and Australian Post (AP). Hypervolume indicator is used as the performance metric to measure the effectiveness of both approaches on the given data sets. In the experimental study, thorough tests are conducted to fine-tune the proposed mutation types for NSGA-II and proposed neighborhood operators for AMOSA. Fine-tuning tests reveal that for NSGA-II, mutation probability does not have a real effect on Turkish data set, whereas lower mutation probabilities are slightly better for AP data set. Moreover, among the AMOSA based neighborhood operators, the one which adds/removes a specific number of links according to temperature (NS-5) performs better than the others for both data sets. After analyzing different operators for both algorithms, a comparison between our NSGA-II based and AMOSA based approaches is performed with the best settings. As a result, we conclude that both of our algorithms are able to find feasible solutions of the problem. Moreover, NSGA-II performs better for larger, whereas AMOSA performs better for smaller size networks.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jestch.2021.06.012en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCapacitated Hub Location Problemen_US
dc.subjectMeta-Heuristic Algorithmsen_US
dc.subjectMulti-Objective Optimizationen_US
dc.subjectRouting and Network Designen_US
dc.titleExperimental Evaluation of Meta-Heuristics for Multi-Objective Capacitated Multiple Allocation Hub Location Problemen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalEngineering Science and Technology, an International Journalen_US
dc.contributor.departmentFSM Vakıf Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKiraz, Berna


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster