Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKuş, Zeki
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Musa
dc.contributor.authorKiraz, Berna
dc.contributor.authorKiraz, Alper
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-20T07:50:42Z
dc.date.available2025-01-20T07:50:42Z
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.identifier.citationKUŞ, Zeki, Musa AYDIN, Berna KİRAZ & Alper KİRAZ. "Neural Architecture Search for Biomedical Image Classification: A Comparative Study Across Data Modalities". Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 160 (2025): 1-19.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11352/5164
dc.description.abstractDeep neural networks have significantly advanced medical image classification across various modalities and tasks. However, manually designing these networks is often time-consuming and suboptimal. Neural Architecture Search (NAS) automates this process, potentially finding more efficient and effective models. This study provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of our two NAS methods, PBC-NAS and BioNAS, across multiple biomedical image classification tasks using the MedMNIST dataset. Our experiments evaluate these methods based on classification performance (Accuracy (ACC) and Area Under the Curve (AUC)) and computational complexity (Floating Point Operation Counts). Results demonstrate that BioNAS models slightly outperform PBC-NAS models in accuracy, with BioNAS-2 achieving the highest average accuracy of 0.848. However, PBC-NAS models exhibit superior computational efficiency, with PBC-NAS-2 achieving the lowest average FLOPs of 0.82 GB. Both methods outperform state-of-the-art architectures like ResNet-18 and ResNet- 50 and AutoML frameworks such as auto-sklearn, AutoKeras, and Google AutoML. Additionally, PBC-NAS and BioNAS outperform other NAS studies in average ACC results (except MSTF-NAS), and show highly competitive results in average AUC. We conduct extensive ablation studies to investigate the impact of architectural parameters, the effectiveness of fine-tuning, search space efficiency, and the discriminative performance of generated architectures. These studies reveal that larger filter sizes and specific numbers of stacks or modules enhance performance. Fine-tuning existing architectures can achieve nearly optimal results without separating NAS for each dataset. Furthermore, we analyze search space efficiency, uncovering patterns in frequently selected operations and architectural choices. This study highlights the strengths and efficiencies of PBCNAS and BioNAS, providing valuable insights and guidance for future research and practical applications in biomedical image classification.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.artmed.2024.103064en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectNeural Architecture Searchen_US
dc.subjectBiomedical Image Classificationen_US
dc.subjectOpposition-Based Differential Evolutionen_US
dc.subjectMedMNISTen_US
dc.titleNeural Architecture Search for Biomedical Image Classification: A Comparative Study Across Data Modalitiesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalArtificial Intelligence in Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.departmentFSM Vakıf Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.authorIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8762-7233en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5825-2230en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8428-3217en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7977-1286en_US
dc.identifier.volume160en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage19en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKuş, Zeki
dc.contributor.institutionauthorAydın, Musa
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKiraz, Berna


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster