Deep Learning–Assisted Malaria Microscopy with Sensitivity-Aware Threshold Optimization
| dc.contributor.author | Dehbi, Fatma | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hamou, Reda Mohamed | |
| dc.contributor.author | Brahami, Menaouer | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shaaban, Sahmoud | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ghoul, Abdelhamid | |
| dc.contributor.author | Latreche, Ameur | |
| dc.contributor.author | Djeffal, Selman | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-09-29T11:03:51Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.department | FSM Vakıf Üniversitesi, Rektörlük, Yapay Zekâ ve Veri Bilimi Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi | |
| dc.description.abstract | Malaria microscopy becomes clinically risky when parasitized erythrocytes are missed, even when a classifier reports high overall accuracy. This study presents an artificial-intelligence-assisted malaria microscopy framework that explicitly optimizes the diagnostic operating point for sensitivity-aware screening. A balanced set of 27,558 National Institutes of Health/National Library of Medicine (NIH/NLM) thin-smear cell images was divided by stratified image-level sampling in the ratio 70:15:15 for training, validation, and independent testing. Two custom convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with complementary capacity–regularization profiles and an equal-weight score-level ensemble were evaluated. Training-only online augmentation, fixed input resizing, validation-only threshold selection, confidence intervals, and error analysis were incorporated to improve reproducibility. At the conventional threshold, the compact CNN achieved the highest accuracy (95.26%). After optimizing the operating point with the recall-weighted F2 objective, the deeper CNN provided the strongest screening-oriented result on the held-out test set, reaching 97.05% sensitivity (95% confidence interval: 96.23%–97.70%), a 96.01% F2-score, a 2.95% false-negative rate, and a receiver-operating-characteristic area under the curve of 0.9876 (95% confidence interval: 0.9842–0.9910). It reduced missed parasitized cells from 177 to 61 relative to its default threshold. The public release does not provide patient identifiers; therefore, the reported split is image-level rather than confirmed to be patient-level independent, and external multicenter validation remains necessary before clinical deployment. The main finding is that the highest-accuracy classifier is not necessarily the most appropriate sensitivity-oriented screening configuration. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | DEHBİ, Fatma, Reda Mohamed HAMOU, Menaouer BRAHAMI, Sahmoud SHAABAN, Abdelhamid GHOUL, Ameur LATRECHE & Selman DJEFFAL. "Deep Learning–Assisted Malaria Microscopy with Sensitivity-Aware Threshold Optimization". Frontiers in Medicine, 13 (2026): 1-19. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fmed.2026.1911275 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 19 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 1 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2026.1911275/full | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11352/6311 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 13 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001869766600001 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Frontiers | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Frontiers in Medicine | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | Convolutional Neural Networks | |
| dc.subject | Deep Learning | |
| dc.subject | Explainable Artificial Intelligence | |
| dc.subject | Malaria Detection | |
| dc.subject | Medical Image Classification | |
| dc.subject | Microscopy Image Analysis | |
| dc.subject | Sensitivity Optimization | |
| dc.title | Deep Learning–Assisted Malaria Microscopy with Sensitivity-Aware Threshold Optimization | |
| dc.type | Article |










